WHITE HOUSE BRIBES – EXPOSED!!!!!
In a landmark legal case, it has been published that: “The United States Congress has, today, released the first of a series of documents proving that Barack Obama and Joseph Biden, while running the United States Government, from the White House, caused the United States Government to operate a bribery program which offered illicit and covert government favors in exchange for bribes. These are the exact kinds of quid pro quo favors which Plaintiff has charged United States Government executives from the White House, Department of Energy and other agencies, with operating to harm Plaintiff while exclusively benefiting his competitors, who United States government officials owned the stock, perks, future job offers and other upsides of. Senators Jim Jordan, Chuck Grassley and other senior current and former members of the United States Congress will testify and swear to the veracity of Plaintiff’s charges in this case.
The White House and the White House political financiers have spent vast amounts of money and influence leverage in order to prevent Plaintiff from ever receiving a jury trial in this matter. They did this in reprisal for Plaintiff reporting an illegal money laundering operation between government officials.
Public officials, including Court officers, were documented, by law enforcement, regulatory and news agencies, receiving payola in family stock market securities, and other influence peddling payola including: “….Certain California State officials, Obama/Biden White House Staff and Federal Agency staff accepted bribes from Silicon Valley Oligarchs and Investment Bank Cartels. They were bribed with: Billions of dollars of Google, Twitter, Facebook, Tesla, Netflix and Sony Pictures stock and stock warrants which is never reported to the FEC; Billions of dollars of Google, Twitter, Facebook, Tesla, Netflix and Sony Pictures search engine rigging and shadow-banning which is never reported to the FEC; Free rent; Male and female prostitutes; Cars; Dinners; Party Financing; Sports Event Tickets; Political campaign printing and mailing services “Donations”; Secret PAC Financing; Jobs in Corporations in Silicon Valley For The Family Members of Those Who Take Bribes And Those Who Take Bribes; “Consulting” contracts from McKinsey as fronted pay-off gigs; Overpriced “Speaking Engagements” which are really just pay-offs conduited for donors; Gallery art; Private jet rides and the use of Government fuel depots (ie: Google handed out NASA jet fuel to staff); Recreational drugs; Real Estate; Fake mortgages; The use of Cayman, Boca Des Tores, Swiss and related money-laundering accounts; The use of HSBC, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Deustche Bank money laundering accounts and covert stock accounts; Free spam and bulk mailing services owned by Silicon Valley corporations; Use of high tech law firms such as Perkins Coie, Wilson Sonsini, MoFo, Covington & Burling, etc. to conduit bribes to officials; Payroll W2 and 1099 payments which were actually bribe payments for political work such as character assassinations and internet rigging; and other means now documented by us, The FBI, the FTC, The SEC, The FEC and journalists….”
Plaintiff was featured in the Wall Street Journal, Detroit News, Popular Science, NPR, and most mainstream news outlets as the inventor, producer and lead of a number of revolutionary patented products and tech start-ups. Public officials who run the San Francisco Bay Area and Washington DC political quid-pro-quo system known as “The Machine” owned and were financed and controlled by companies who competed with Plaintiff. Those companies include Tesla, Alphabet/Google/Youtube, Linkedin, Netflix and their ilk, known as “The Silicon Valley Cartel.” The Cartel has paid more cash and services to these political officials, and received more payola and kick-backs from those officials, THAN ANY ENTITY IN RECORDED HISTORY. It was a clear case of bribery, as proven in over a thousand lawsuits and government investigations conforming the assertions. The XKEYSCORE/ICIJ/FINCen/InterPOl financial crimes databases also prove these assertions.
Federal law enforcement and expert forensic officials have stated that: “ONLY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WAS CAPABLE OF OPERATING THE STATE SPONSORED ATTACKS AGAINST PLAINTIFF.” Only the US. Government had the means, resources, motivation, command-and-control and proven ‘Watergate Plumber’-type history of such attacks. All of the financial compensation and orders for these attacks also ONLY lead back to the US. Government and the Silicon Valley Cartel ownerships by government officials.
As the world, now knows, EVERY White House uses Dirty Tricks and Fusion GPS/Black Cube attack operatives. Watergate was the standard and NOT the exception.
With the passage of time, those lawyers have been hired into other matters and Plaintiff has found that Defendants have conflicted out all other law firms capable of taking on Defendants.
The primary reasons for this legal action is to compensate Plaintiff for the harms that have been proven to have taken place and have been proven to have been operated by the Defendants as reprisal for reporting crimes by the Defendants and competing with the Defendants business interests with superior competing product metrics. Those harms include: The federal government staff cut off benefits income and housing since 2008. They cut off government contracts and funding. They blocked patent monetization income. They used their media network, designed to kill off competing Presidential candidates, to run global character assassination revenge attacks against Plaintiffs (via Google, Gawker, Gizmodo, Media Matters, Black Cube, etc.). They used White House ‘Plumbers’ (Carney, Podesta, Schmidt, Denton, Rattner, Gibbs, Axelrod, etc.) to operate dirty tricks operations. They exposed Plaintiffs to toxins at the Department of Energy labs. They manipulated and ‘red flagged’ HR databases to cut off jobs for Plaintiffs. The attackers engaged in the bribery of contracting officers and agents to damage competitors and only award the attackers associates. The attackers engaged in internet server manipulation and website spoofing. The attackers used manipulation of online payment transaction systems to cut off Plaintiffs revenue. The state-sponsored attackers also engaged in: Hacking of competitors/witnesses devices; theft of patent materials; threats and possible murders of whistle-blowers; ordering crony’s and NVCA allies to black-list competitors/witnesses; bribery of public officials to direct funds and contracts to them and away from competitors/witnesses competing products; government funds embezzlement; placement of sabotage moles, working for the White House, in competitors/witnesses companies to sabotage Plaintiffs plans and report internal data to competitors; Honey traps; DNS re-routing of all internet connections of competitors/witnesses; and more…
Crooked officials and politicians will do anything to cover this up and protect their stock market insider trading bribes. Look at their family stock market transactions and you can see the truth! There is a civil war in America between Democrat and Republican politicians, Judges and insiders but this is about crime, not ideologies. The DOJ and the courts seem to only work for white house financiers per Congressional reports. Plaintiff is not involved with either of those political parties and has been applauded as “Fully Bi-Partisan”.
Plaintiff’s peers, and Plaintiff, have provided direct evidence review by the FBI, IG, AG, FTC, SEC and other law enforcement and regulatory agencies that they report to. All of this evidence has been provided to those agencies, in writing, during that time. The federal agency officials CHOSE to operate a cover-up. This information proves that a quid pro quo stock market bribery scam exists within, and between, agencies and politicians. “The Machine” politicians take bribes in the form of stock market securities, real estate and internet data manipulation services from Google, Facebook, etc. These politicians are CRIMINALS that only work for themselves.
Plaintiff lived with, socialized with, worked with and got inside scoops from, these politicians including White House staff and US. Senators and their top staff. They told us how their crimes and schemes worked. We have the proof of their quid pro quo organized crime scams.
See further evidence sets at: https://case-xyz2020a.com and/or http://www.report-corruption.com and/or https://never-give.in and/or http://hardforensics.com and/or http://www.stimulus-scam.com and the Court and Congressional Investigation archives
Plaintiff assisted law enforcement and regulatory officials in an investigation of a trillion dollar energy industry scam involving stocks, off-shore mining and election manipulation by public officials. FBI-grade evidence and proof of these assertions has been filed in this case.
The corrupt politician lapdogs and their Big Tech oligarch bosses have found that their abusive, self-dealing ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
Criminal politicians and their Silicon Valley oligarch financiers organized a felony-class ‘enterprise’ to exchange stock market shares, jobs, government cash, sex, exclusive public policy ‘switcheroos’ and other corrupt actions. They put hit jobs on their competitors and whistle-blowers using government resources. Now those crooks need to be sued and have criminal referrals filed against them with the FBI, DOJ, SEC, FTC, GAO, FEC, FINCEN and Congress! The FBI, and other law enforcement organizations, define a “cartel” as: ‘An association of industrialists and business firms organized covertly to establish a national, or international monopoly, by price fixing and ownership of controlling stock, to operate a trust or monopoly to reduce competition between themselves by allocating markets, censoring public knowledge, manipulating governments or controlling the price and production of a product or service.’
This case is about a political “cartel” which meets every aspect of that definition.
-
The book claims “Obama and his administration would deem industries either destructive to the environment or exploitative for the financial and professional gain of his friends, including…
-
TodayRepublicans in the majority on the panel have invited Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a Democratic candidate for president, to testify on censorship, tech companies and free speech. The event is scheduled…
-
2 days agoThe White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20500 To … based on specific cybersecurity criteria published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that, for …
-
TodayPresident Joe Biden met briefly with a top auto union chief Wednesday, a White House official tells CNN, as talks between the United Auto Workers and the Big Three US automakers continue ahead of …
-
TodayThe Big Tech companies have adamantly denied the GOP assertions and say they enforce their rules impartially for everyone regardless of ideology or political affiliation.
-
7 days agoSenator Hagerty’s remarks and the debate exchange may be found here.Text of his prepared remarks is below. Senator Hagerty: Mr. President, just last week, a federal judge ruled that the First Amendment prohibits the Biden Administration from colluding with Big Tech to censor Americans’ speech.So, the court ordered Biden Administration officials and agencies not to coordinate with Big Tech …
-
1 day agoWASHINGTON, July 19 (Reuters) – New draft guidelines released by U.S. antitrust enforcers on Wednesday lay the groundwork for tougher scrutiny of planned mergers by Big Tech companies like Amazon …
-
7 days agoPublished 9:07 PM PDT, July 12, 2023. WASHINGTON (AP) — The chair of the Federal Trade Commission defended her aggressive legal strategy toward the country’s biggest technology companies Thursday as House Republicans charged that the agency has become overzealous and politicized under President Joe Biden. Republicans charged that Lina Khan …
-
Sep 8, 2022Today, the White House convened a listening session with experts and practitioners on the harms that tech platforms cause and the need for greater accountability.
-
1 day agoIf left unchecked, Big Auto’s data business can soon make the 2018 Google+ API data breach and recent $725 million Facebook user privacy settlement look tame by comparison. As if that’s not …
